Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. A. S.,
& Greenberg, S. (Eds.). (1995). Readings in human-computer interaction:
Toward the year 2000 (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Bardeen, M. G., & Lederman, L. M. (1998, July 10).
Coherence in science education. Science, 281, 178-179.
Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson-Gray, R.
O. (1998). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in
clinical and educational settings (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000).
Web work: Information seeking and knowledge work on the World Wide Web
(Vol. 1). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning
and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. M. Carver &
D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress
(pp. xxiii, 522). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working
knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard
Business School Press.
Derry, S. J., Levin, J. R., Osana, H., Jones, M. S.,
& Peterson, M. (2000). Fostering students’ statistical and
scientific thinking: Lessons learned from an innovative college course.
American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 747-773.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Greeno, J. G. (1998). Situativity of knowing, learning,
and research. American Psychologist, 3(1), 5-26.
Grudin, J. (1990). Groupware and cooperative work:
Problems and prospects. In B. Laural (Ed.), The art of computer-based
tools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight
challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92-105.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management
research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hekimian, S. (1984). Criteria for the institutional
evaluation of community college staff development programs. Gainesville,
FL: Florida University, Gainesville Institute of Higher Education.
Horvath, J., & Lehrer, R. (2000). The design of
a case-based hypermedia teaching tool. International Journal of Computers
for Mathematical Learning, 5, 115-141.
Karasti, H. (2001). Bridging work practice and system
design: Integrating systemic analysis, appreciative intervention and
practitioner participation. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 10,
Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. 1995. Interaction analysis:
Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1):39-103.
Kazdin, A. E. (1998). Research design in clinical psychology
(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Koehler, M. J. (in press). Designing case-based hypermedia
tools to help teachers understand children's mathematical development.
Cognition & Instruction.
Koehler, M. J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). Designing
a hypermedia tool for learning about children's mathematical cognition.
Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(2), 123-145.
Koschmann, T. (in press). Tools of termlessness: Technology,
educational reform, and Deweyan inquiry. In T. O'Shea (Ed.), Virtual
learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Koschmann, T., Kelson, A., Feltovich, P., & Barrows,
H. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach
to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.),
Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83-124). Mahwah, NJ:
Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998). Teaching, mathematics
and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teacher's
Lehrer, R., & Chazan, D. (Eds.). (1998). Designing
learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lehrer, R., & Curtis, C. (2000). Why are some solids
perfect? Conjectures and experiments by third graders. Teaching Children
Mathematics, 6(5), 324-329.
Lerner, J., & Triole, J. (2000). The simple economics
of open source (Working Paper No. 7600). Washington, DC: National Bureau
of Economic Research.
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1999). Multimodal studies
of instructional discourse (Report from the Classroom Discourse Workshop).
Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L.
(1983). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services
evaluation. Hingham, MA, U.S.A.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher
education. In J. Sikula & T. J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.),
Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 722-744). New York: Macmillan
Metzler, M. W., & Tjeerdsma, B. L. (1998). PETE
program assessment within a development, research, and improvement framework.
Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(4), 468-492.
Moore, R., (2000). Research and development plan and
schedule for the research project on application of distributed object
computation testbed technologies to archival preservation and access
requirements. San Diego, CA: San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering ([Updated]
ed.). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis,
IN: New Riders.
Perens, B. (1999). The open source definition. In C.
DiBona & S. Ockman & M. Stone (Eds.), Open sources: Voices from
the open source revolution (1st ed.). Beijing: O'Reilly.
Rajasekar, A., Marciano, R., & Moore, R. (1999,
March). Collection-based persistent archives. San Diego, CA: Paper presented
at the 16th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems.
Rajasekar, A. & Moore, M. (2001). Data and Metadata
Collections for Scientific Applications. Presented at the European High
Performance Computing conference, Amsterdam, Holland, June 26.
Rajasekar, A. &.Wan, M. (2002). SRB & SRBRack
- Components of a Virtual Data Grid Architecture. Presented at the Advanced
Simulation Technologies Conference, San Diego, April 15-17.
Rajasekar, A., Wan, M., & Moore, R. (2002) MySRB
& SRB - Components of a Data Grid. Presented at the 11th International
Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, Edinburgh, Scotland,
Rouse, W. B. (1991). Design for success: A human-centered
approach to designing successful products and systems. New York: Wiley.
Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1992). Lectures on
conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (1996). Innovations
in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum
Seyfried, E. (1998). Evaluation of quality aspects
in vocational training programmes: Synthesis report. Thessaloniki, Greece:
CEDEFOP--European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.
Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (2002). Special issue:
Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics
learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2 & 3).
Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface:
Strategies for effective human-computer-interaction (3rd ed.). Reading,
MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll,
S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods
and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics
instruction in Germany, Japan, and the united states. Education Statistics
Quarterly, 1(2), 109-112.
Strom, D., Kemeny, V., Lehrer, R., & Forman, E.
(2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical
argument. Cognitive Science.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP
evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research
and Development in Education, 5(1), 19-25.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. San Francisco:
Thorn, C. (1996). Images of cooperation: The importance
of strategic alliances as a cooperative model. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche
Trevisan, M. S. (1997). Making better decisions about
school problems: How administrators use evaluation to find solutions.
Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 277-279.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford
Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction
into context: Examples from legal and medical education. Journal of
the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427.
Willke, H., Krück, C. P., & Thorn, C. (1995).
Benevolent conspiracies: The role of enabling technologies in the welfare
of nations: The cases of SDI, Sematech, and EUREKA. New York: Walter
Zuengler, J., Ford,
C., & Fassnacht, C. (1999). Analyst eyes and camera eyes: Theoretical
and technological considerations in "seeing" the details of
classroom interaction (Report Series 2.40): Retrieved May 16, 2002,
from State University of New York, University at Albany, National Research
Center on English Learning & Achievement Web site: http://cela.albany.edu/analysteyes/index.html.